Hull Border Force Deliberately Destroying Evidence?

Back in March 2013 (link here) we posted about some 'clients' of ours receiving unreadable copies of the officers notebooks from the Data Protection Unit in Croydon. We assumed that it was a bad photocopy but unbelievably the Data Protection Unit say that these ARE the originals!!!

What are Hull Border Force trying to hide?

NOT a bad photocopy but the ORIGINAL notebook!



Reply from Data Protection Unit about unreadable Hull UKBF Officers notebooks


Not been well preserved??? ... that's an understatement if there ever was one! Did the officers fall in the River Hull perhaps? Did their sniffer dog pi## on them (the notebooks)?

I'm truly lost for words ... as are the notebooks!

Posted by at

2 comments:

"In the eyes of the Tribunal the review letter contained several preconceptions, prejudgments and non-sequiturs"

"the absurdity of this reason is demonstrated by simply stating it"

"We therefore find that Mr Sked misdirected himself as to the Policy in carrying out the review and his decision is therefore one that no reasonable review officer could have arrived at."

... commonly known here at N2D as 'Skeds' ... that is to say these are Judges comments regarding UKBA Review Officer Ian Sked's reasons for rejecting peoples appeals against seizures.

Comments are now moderated to keep out spam and those with malicious intent. The author of this blog is not liable for the content of any comments ... period!

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)