Jeez, l'm sick and tired of all the apologetic, emancipated emasculated 'males' on our msm ... not forgetting all the harpies crawling out from under their stones.
The late 60's and the 70's were great times ... and l ain't apologising for them! ... and nothing after them either!
edit:- Furor's right ... and nothing before either!
The late 60's and the 70's were great times ... and l ain't apologising for them! ... and nothing after them either!
edit:- Furor's right ... and nothing before either!
Hell yeah! l 2nd that. Well said SH
ReplyDeleteBrilliant!!!
ReplyDelete"
ReplyDeleteThe late 60's and the 70's were great times"
Daddy?
http://2khh4.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/was-sh-ever-in-bletchley-in-1967.html
:p
Damn! How'd you find that? :)
DeleteMissed the 60s, because I was born 1960. I caught the 70s and 80s instead.... Oh dear....:-$
ReplyDeleteSome of us just caught various STIs :p...and liver disease.
Delete"the apologetic, emancipated 'males' on our msm..."
ReplyDeleteI think you meant emasculated, rather than emapncipated.
Dudes, I ain't gonna apologise for anything since 1833.
DeleteHel man! I would take it back to 1813.
DeleteIn fact... I apologise for NOTHING.
If it was wrong I will take my punishment before Odins court. But before the same court, I will take my revenge. :-))))
I do Henry, l do! hahaha ... changed! :)
DeleteAgree with you 100% Furor. Altered the OP to reflect the point. Cheers
DeleteGive me the alpha males any day or night of the week. Those girls knew damn well what they were doing at that age, l know l did. The stupid old cows are just pissed off that they got dumped and got fat and ugly and now want someone to blame and hope for some compo. Fuck em!
ReplyDeleteInteresting point of view. And one I can only agree with. :-)
DeleteAre you already married?..... :-))
No she isn't. She's had lots of husbands but they just haven't been hers! :)
DeleteWives too!
l take the 5th lol xxx
DeleteBad boys do it for me :0)
ReplyDeleteAbsofuckinglutely, SH!
ReplyDeleteace
ReplyDeleteHeartening to see that there are Hombres left in UK. People here in Spain think the British are bunch of pathetic wimps. l'll pass this post onto them to show Hombres are alive and wellin the UK.
ReplyDeleteExcellent post Smokey, l see Zaphod did the same at Leg Irons gaff.
Jussy, l love you to bits. Go girl!
:-)
DeleteIt wasn't at Legiron's; it was Frank Davis, re Jimmy S.
I was rather pleased with it, I'll give it another airing -
In early teens, a boy suddenly notice that girls are interesting. 18 year old girls are clearly the gold standard, but utterly out of reach. Girls his own age seem more attainable, but it soon becomes clear that they’re only interested in boys two years older. Eventually he realises that girls two years younger than him may consider him eligible. Most of those girls are, it turns out, not interested in boys yet, and most haven’t developed the interesting bumps which are the source of his interest, nor are they practising the flirtatious behaviour which he observes in his female contemporaries.
But some have! They are few in number, and over-subscribed, but his formative years of unfulfilled yearning are likely to be focused on those. Later, he gets the chance to upgrade to the 16 year olds, and ultimately the 18s. But he never forgets that foxy 14yr-old.
There’s nothing perverted in an adult male seeing some sexual attractiveness in a 14yr-old girl who is making an effort to project it. The vast majority of men will never follow it up, through either wisdom, lack of access, or a sense of fair play. The law is the law, our culture is our culture, but I won’t join in the witch-hunt against a guy who had them queueing up to be flattered by his attention. I’m getting sick of apologising for being male.
For me, a paedophile is someone who has sexual lust for girls below puberty. Using that word for anything else just dilutes its seriousness.
As for the “evidence”, well he was a bit odd, wasn’t he?
Burn the witch!
I was sexually active at 14 (and that only because I missed my chance when I was 13)...and I quite fancied the famous bleached-blond bloke. I certainly would have given him one, willingly and in suspenders and stockings too(or knee-socks and pigtails; I was nothing if not versatile)
DeleteThe term for a bloke who fancies just-post-pubescent girls is 'ephebophile' (thanks to m'learned friend for that piece of info). I may have been looking for a father-figure, who knows. I was fully capable of giving consent.
The only caveat I would add is that the activity needed to be consensual, and the girls not 'vulnerable'.
IMO.
Sheer class!
ReplyDeleteMuchos Hombres!
ReplyDeleteAnyone for Good Morning Little Schoolgirl?
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5rM16Q7Rgg
or Crew Slut by Zappa
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VOa9IZ86Ak
or Catholic Girls again by Zappa
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lSZ77SkAbI8
Works both ways anon. Here's Maggie May
Deletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F01aLeErvoU
Young Man/ Older Woman Millie Jackson
Deletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJ9hBz1py6Q
Mrs Robinson Simon and Garfunkel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_jmDscGi7E
Edge of Seventeen Stevie Nicks
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dn8-4tjPxD8
In the EU the age of consent varies from 13-15. The UK revels in all sorts of paranoia that the sheeples just lap up. lt's bloody embarrassing
ReplyDeleteI'm a MAN!....FFS, you can't even mention his name which is"JIMMY SAVILE", there you go big boys , i have done it for you.
ReplyDeleteWhat you "little shits" should have done on your blog was not mentioned the subject at all, virtually all your readers would have forgotten your heartfelt tribute to jimmy savile and his mate who died recently and that they were your heroes.
Instead you try and defend being a sexual predator/pervert with co author cheapbird slutty saying the girls were asking for it.
YOU IGNORANT MORONS, THIS ONE POST OF YOURS WILL RUIN ANY CREDIBILTY THAT YOU HAD.
this story will run and run with the full horror of Jimmy Savile and his circle of friends being exposed.
All this post has done is make your followers think what does Zaphod/Smoking Hot think they do not have to apologise for, especially after your "our culture is our culture" and the "law is the law" and being sick of apologising squirming kiddy fiddling defending crap....thank god you live in this country Zaphod.
Disgusting
"thank god you live in this country Zaphod."
DeleteYep this cuntry where,despite Blair's best efforts, we still hold a man innocent until proven guilty in a court of law and not the court of Guardian Commentators And Daily Mail Readers.
Your stupidity is beyond belief nameless "Be a man and mention his name!!!". This post wasn't about JS at all. You're the ignorant moron.
DeleteSo l wrote a heartfelt tribute to JS did l? Want to read it again?
http://nothing-2-declare.blogspot.co.uk/2011/10/now-then-now-then-now-then.html
lt's about Jimmy Corrigan ... MY FRIEND! I stand by all l wrote about him. l quoted JS because l met him on a few occasions. Got that? .. the word is 'met', not 'friend', not l 'knew him' ... just 'met'. l also quoted how he came across to me ... and that was it! The post was about MY FRIEND! It came about because JS had just died and hence the introductory paragraph. Jesus, you really are thick!
Jussy, Alcantara & Khaleesi put their comments. Get that? ... 'their' comments based on 'their' lives!
l also stand by my post of being a MAN. I don't go in for all this PC crap and self-flagellation just to appease the mob. A MAN protects the women around him whether they be 80 or 8 and l've done that throughout my life on many occasions. l also believe that women have a right to do as they wish ... whether l agree with them or not. l also believe in justice and not lynch mobs.
So, nameless "Be a man and mention his name!!!" l suggest that if you have nothing factual or intelligent to say ... stfu! You can no doubt take solace in your likely ancestors who executed Rebecca Nurse.
My integrity remains intact.
F'ing hell SH wtf is that guy on? What a tosser.
DeleteWe used to attract a much better and more articulate form of troll. Now all we seem to get are the mouthings of some semi-illiterate 13 year old overdosing on android.
DeleteHe, the troll, is no doubt one of "I WAS ABUSED !!111" groupies.
Where is the evidence? All we have at the moment are non coroborated reports from compensation band wagon jumpers.
ReplyDeleteWitnesses? D.N.A samples? statement of admission from Saville?
No?
Thought not.
Exactly what worries me too.
DeleteDont need any of that FT when you got the MSM to tell you what to think, cos theyre totally trustworthy right?
ReplyDeleteThe nameless "mention his name" tells us what we "should have done on your blog"?
ReplyDeleteHe/she/it doesn't get it, obviously.
A MAN doesn't do what he "should do". He does what HE thinks is right, and takes the consequences.
I don't need credibility with you, nameless, certainly not if it means being a hypocrite. We don't run this blog for money, we have no masters.
Being male and healthy, I am a sexual predator. No apologies. A pervert? No. My sexuality is healthily grounded in the instinct of thousands of millenia, not in your modern twisted artificial imaginary self-denial.
Kidiot,that last post PROVES you are simply a troll who is spamming. The N2D names are public record -although we don't commonly use them on site they are known to all the regulars. BUT YOU STILL HIDE behind an 'Anon'.
ReplyDeleteGet off, stop wasting all our time with your pathetic whinging. Phone the NSPCC or whatever they call themselves if you think you were 'abused'.
You hide behind an ANON- Dwarf
ReplyDeleteand so do all the rest of the "regulars"
you pillock.
BLOCKED DWARF- SAYS YOU STILL HIDE!!!!
FFS.
this Jimmy savile sympathising is a disgrace and is being read by the silent majority of your followers
prattle on about trolls/spam and anons, the vile mindset of the "men" who run the outfit is there for all to see.
Blocked Dwarf- as the owner of this site, perhaps you should have a word in the ear the pillocks SH and Zaphod/Jussy and tell them Jimmy Savile sympathy threads are as about as vile as it gets now.
ReplyDeleteSeriously how can N2D credibilty remain intact after the lying and content thats been posted
You sir, are a coward of the lowest denomination. Your rantings verge on the pathological.
DeleteM Brown
mbrown740@ymail.com
XX i will not post on the thread if it appears,as long as there are no more deletions on this thread ,this kind of candle tribute crap will damage N2D more than you think. XX
ReplyDeleteOHHH Threats! I LOVE threats.
Can't speak for S.H. But go on then laddie. Bring it on arse hole. I am open to ALL threats.
Just try it wanker.
And, dont forget, where I work, we can have your home address from your IP in about 30 seconds flat! ;-)
ReplyDelete"I prefer choose to have the freedom of choice wether i use my real name or not and thats how it will stay- my choice."
ReplyDeleteAll I wanted to hear from you Kid, now the 'silent readers' will know who is the coward -hoisted by his own twisted logic and can judge accordingly.
/discussion
The journalist John Simpson has brought thinly veiled accusations against another BBC employee, Derek McCulloch. l came into contact with Simpson at a number of functions and did not take to him in the slightest. McCulloch has been dead for 45 years.
ReplyDeleteThe collective number of celebrities bringing forth accusations increases whilst credibility decreases. Pendle rises from the grave.
M Brown
mbrown740@ymail.com
Pendle Witch Trials, where a 9yr old girl was chief prosecution witness resulting in 9 people being found guilty and hanged.
DeleteAww bless, what a sweet vulnerable child. Got to be thankful that it couldn't happen today ;)
and the beat goes on. Now Wilfred Brambell. Who's next? Kenneth Williams? Charles Hawtrey? Sid James? They all qualify as they worked for the BBC at some point and more importantly are now dead.
DeleteKenny Everett?
DeletePart of the fun of being a man, is hearing the hysterical squeaking of the mice.
ReplyDelete"Don't do/say that, because we wouldn't dare to!"
Now that I know that Nameless disapproves of me, perhaps I'll rethink my outlook?
Or perhaps I won't?
Hmm.
Nah.
Bring on the consequences!
:-)
Hmmm Criticising posters for not using their real names while posting anonymously. The irony is not lost on me. Our little troll friend wouldn't know a valid argument if it was rammed up his arse with a Jack-Hammer.
ReplyDeleteNo. But he may remember it for a VERY long time.
DeleteThe road to hell is paved with good intentions. Relying on memories that are around 40 years old is not reliable at all. Try it yourself and see how reliable your memories are. That's why my State in the USA has a statute of limitations and l thank god it does. Not because it protects the guilty but because it protects the innocent. l'd rather one guilty man go free than 9 innocent are found guilty.
ReplyDeleteThe difference between false memories and true ones is the same as for jewels: it is always the false ones that look the most real, the most brilliant.
DeleteRansom Stoddard: You're not going to use the story, Mr. Scott?
ReplyDeleteMaxwell Scott: No, sir. This is the West, sir. When the legend becomes fact, print the legend.
Ever tried remembering an incident that happened decades ago? Try it and you'll see how poor it is - especially when it comes to details and specifics. Your memory is influenced by a myriad of things after the actual event. What you recollect is the truth to you but in reality it's probably wrong.
ReplyDeleteThere's also the forgotten factor-the 60'/70's was the drug era and drug use was the norm - especially in the entertainment industry.
l thought l had a good memory until l tried to remember things from 30-40 years ago - and l'm talking about things that were very important memorable events. All l really get is snippets that l think is true.
lf you can remember the 60's you weren't there. lol
DeleteWhole thing has become a farce and a circus. Glad to see some still stand up for innocent until proven guilty. The only comment here against it is from a complete dipshit who obviously can't read. A complete tosser.
ReplyDeleteCouldn't agree more and especially on the lowlife troll.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.annaraccoon.com/politics/past-lives-and-present-misgivings-part-four/
ReplyDeleteWOW!