That ain't my America



Got this from some friends of mine in the States.

Would a patriotic British song like this be banned here?
Posted by at
Labels: , ,

6 comments:

  1. PropWednesday, March 30, 2011 10:40:00 pm

    Only one l know is Metallicas These colours dont run. Yanks are more patriotic at showing it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. SHINAR'S BASKET CASEWednesday, March 30, 2011 11:10:00 pm

    "I'm mad as hell..."

    translated into Brit means "Please Sir, would you mind awfully not persecuting me anymore, if its no trouble?".

    Of course the song would get banned, we live in a country where burning a fucking paper poppy will get you arrested.

    BTW according to Golem The One Eyed Monster Who Sits In The Corner And Sucks Out Your Brains (aka the TV): next week there is a new docu series about Smugglers and how our brave customs men combat them....should be worth a laugh.

    ReplyDelete
  3. PropWednesday, March 30, 2011 11:41:00 pm

    Not another fucking staged reality show with goonies thinkin theyre Pacino, Depp. WTF?

    ReplyDelete
  4. SHINAR'S BASKET CASEThursday, March 31, 2011 12:13:00 am

    Prop, no doubt it'll be loaded with the subtext that EVIL TOBACCO SMUGGLERS ARE FUNDING TERRORISTS!!!1111
    (when they, the smugglers, get time off from impregnating gym slip teenage single moms with alien crocodile babies of course)

    And there will no doubt be the further inference that legit baccy buyers are also D A M A G I N G our economy and are really criminals who must be CONTROLLED.

    ReplyDelete
  5. PropThursday, March 31, 2011 8:32:00 am

    Bring it on cos were already branded outlaws anyway and our dictionary translates 'mad as hell' to 'fuck off'

    ReplyDelete
  6. PropThursday, March 31, 2011 9:05:00 am

    Ride of Respect this Sunday :-)
    Put this Skyn up SH
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-ZQ5T8wjsg&feature=related

    ReplyDelete

"In the eyes of the Tribunal the review letter contained several preconceptions, prejudgments and non-sequiturs"

"the absurdity of this reason is demonstrated by simply stating it"

"We therefore find that Mr Sked misdirected himself as to the Policy in carrying out the review and his decision is therefore one that no reasonable review officer could have arrived at."

... commonly known here at N2D as 'Skeds' ... that is to say these are Judges comments regarding UKBA Review Officer Ian Sked's reasons for rejecting peoples appeals against seizures.

Comments are now moderated to keep out spam and those with malicious intent. The author of this blog is not liable for the content of any comments ... period!

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)