WARNING! Do NOT post ANY questions/requests on this blog regarding ANY issues with Border Force (Customs) We now have a FORUM for this where members will gladly help you. GO TO www.n2d.me/bbs
8 comments:
"In the eyes of the Tribunal the review letter contained several preconceptions, prejudgments and non-sequiturs"
"the absurdity of this reason is demonstrated by simply stating it"
"We therefore find that Mr Sked misdirected himself as to the Policy in carrying out the review and his decision is therefore one that no reasonable review officer could have arrived at."
... commonly known here at N2D as 'Skeds' ... that is to say these are Judges comments regarding UKBA Review Officer Ian Sked's reasons for rejecting peoples appeals against seizures.
Comments are now moderated to keep out spam and those with malicious intent. The author of this blog is not liable for the content of any comments ... period!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Now that's what I call smoky-drinky!
ReplyDeleteI want to go THERE! ... and never come back.
ReplyDeleteWow that looks awesome! Im gonna make a start on turning my large garden shed into a smoky-drinky tomorrow,thanks for the inspiration.
ReplyDeleteWhere's the crisps.?
ReplyDeleteGive us a "coded" shout when its opening time
I'll mobilise the Northmen to march down and
chill out for sesssion or three
Stand up
Speak up
Kick ass.
It..... it.... almost looks like a pub. *sniff*
ReplyDeleteI remember those....
Crisps? ... if it's on the banned list, we've got it!
ReplyDeleteI was sure I commented on this yesterday SH, blogger playing up maybe, so to repeat my word of wisdom;
ReplyDeleteCheers!!!
corrrrrr!!!! wouldn't customs just love that place. All those goods and not a penny paid in british tax, i love it!!!
ReplyDelete