Border Force Officer 4604 ... LIAR!

N2D Social Club did it's first baccy run and we did a post on it ... here. The club secretary put in a complaint about 4604 and this is the reply he received. 4604 has blatantly lied about the incident. However, the club's secretary, did not put in his initial complaint that there were at least 8 witnesses to the incident. lt's going to get interesting :)

You can see why we say that all complaints at Border Force Complaints Team are handled by the 'coffee machine'. Note the 'Accredited to the Customer Service Excellence standard' ... hahaha. Guess who gave them this accreditation ... none other than G4S! (Yes, that G4S that made such a cockup of security at the Olympics). Wonder if BF Complaints Team returned the favour for G4S?

Also posted on our FORUM

No comments:

Post a Comment

"In the eyes of the Tribunal the review letter contained several preconceptions, prejudgments and non-sequiturs"

"the absurdity of this reason is demonstrated by simply stating it"

"We therefore find that Mr Sked misdirected himself as to the Policy in carrying out the review and his decision is therefore one that no reasonable review officer could have arrived at."

... commonly known here at N2D as 'Skeds' ... that is to say these are Judges comments regarding UKBA Review Officer Ian Sked's reasons for rejecting peoples appeals against seizures.

Comments are now moderated to keep out spam and those with malicious intent. The author of this blog is not liable for the content of any comments ... period!