The Battle Against Parking Tickets 26,27 & 28. (1 to 25 won!)


Zaphod has wrote about this at his place so pop over and take a look. When we finally got in court, we made 2 appearances. One for approx 4 mins where they asked us to leave so they could confer ... and one for 6 mins where we got a result. Well, sort of!

Just a small point if you are ever in court for these things or indeed fighting the UKBA. Get a friend suitably business like dressed to sit in the public gallery with a notebook and pen. Your friend can be writing out their shopping list or writing to their mum for all it matters. lt makes the magistrates very wary because they have no idea who this person is so they tend to behave themselves as they feel they are under scrutiny. :) Your friend does not have to account for being there ... they are simply a member of the public but the magistrates don't know that!
Posted by at
Labels:

3 comments:

"In the eyes of the Tribunal the review letter contained several preconceptions, prejudgments and non-sequiturs"

"the absurdity of this reason is demonstrated by simply stating it"

"We therefore find that Mr Sked misdirected himself as to the Policy in carrying out the review and his decision is therefore one that no reasonable review officer could have arrived at."

... commonly known here at N2D as 'Skeds' ... that is to say these are Judges comments regarding UKBA Review Officer Ian Sked's reasons for rejecting peoples appeals against seizures.

Comments are now moderated to keep out spam and those with malicious intent. The author of this blog is not liable for the content of any comments ... period!

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)