Kates answer to No Smoking Day

Well done Kate!  The righteous will be indignant with rage!

The teens will lap it up ... be a rebel in one easy move!

Ha ha ha
Posted by at
Labels: , ,

9 comments:

  1. JJThursday, March 10, 2011 7:17:00 pm

    What a great pic...we want more celebs who smoke to put two fingers up to the ninny-nanny state.

    Where is the best place in Europe to get pipe tobacco?

    Thanks

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousThursday, March 10, 2011 7:19:00 pm

    Despite the Daily Fail attempting to portray her as a horror pig, it would be rat -> drainpipe as far as I'm concerned. And we could have a nice fag afterwards.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousThursday, March 10, 2011 7:42:00 pm

    JJ

    Belgium is a good place to go for pipe baccy.

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousFriday, March 11, 2011 12:56:00 am

    And, she's obviously indoors, double damnation.

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousFriday, March 11, 2011 8:52:00 am

    "Anonymous said...
    Despite the Daily Fail attempting to portray her as a horror pig, it would be rat -> drainpipe as far as I'm concerned. And we could have a nice fag afterwards."

    Motion seconded....although not straight after you mate, I ain't into sloppy seconds!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Dick PuddlecoteFriday, March 11, 2011 1:32:00 pm

    Good girl. :)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Angry ExileFriday, March 11, 2011 1:46:00 pm

    Would have been even better if it had been Kate Middleton. Some of the Righteous might actually have exploded.

    ReplyDelete
  8. ZaphodFriday, March 11, 2011 9:33:00 pm

    I've noticed that the Righteous always expect footballers, athletes, and media personalities to "set an example".

    Clearly, Kate has decided that models belong in the same category as rock stars and artists, who do as they like. Good for her!

    ReplyDelete
  9. AnonymousSunday, March 13, 2011 3:58:00 pm

    Well done Kate ! ! ! !

    ReplyDelete

"In the eyes of the Tribunal the review letter contained several preconceptions, prejudgments and non-sequiturs"

"the absurdity of this reason is demonstrated by simply stating it"

"We therefore find that Mr Sked misdirected himself as to the Policy in carrying out the review and his decision is therefore one that no reasonable review officer could have arrived at."

... commonly known here at N2D as 'Skeds' ... that is to say these are Judges comments regarding UKBA Review Officer Ian Sked's reasons for rejecting peoples appeals against seizures.

Comments are now moderated to keep out spam and those with malicious intent. The author of this blog is not liable for the content of any comments ... period!

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)