Drink Warning Sticker

I am indebted to the designer of this label and P&O Ferries who thought it important enough to stick it on a 1 Litre bottle of Jack Daniels that l purchased from their onboard shop.

Thanks for the thought guys but it really wasn't necessary .... no matter how drunk l get l never wake up next to a fat, beer bellied, ugly lass!
Posted by at
Labels: ,

9 comments:

  1. ZaphodSaturday, March 12, 2011 10:35:00 am

    I think the message of the symbol is, "If you drink a lot you will become very attractive to the opposite sex, and pregnancies may result."

    ReplyDelete
  2. Smoking HotSaturday, March 12, 2011 10:43:00 am

    What the hell you drinking, Zaphod?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Furor TeutonicusSaturday, March 12, 2011 11:04:00 am

    "Drinking gives fat birds back aches"?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Shinar's Basket CaseSaturday, March 12, 2011 11:29:00 am

    And there was me thinking it meant simply: Don't Date Northern Girls.

    I am so out of touch.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Smoking HotSaturday, March 12, 2011 11:37:00 am

    The North .... Viz .... and Sid's chat up lines 'you don't sweat much for a fat lass'

    ReplyDelete
  6. Shinar's Basket CaseSaturday, March 12, 2011 11:53:00 am

    Looking more closely at the picture, it might mean : DO NOT LET YOUR 12 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER DRINK PINTS.

    ?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Wrinkled WeaselSaturday, March 12, 2011 1:22:00 pm

    I should be so lucky

    ReplyDelete
  8. AnonymousSaturday, March 12, 2011 8:23:00 pm

    They should have a pic of the fragrant Ms Arnott on there with the message...."Do you really want another drink?" It would put me straight off.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Woodsy42Sunday, March 13, 2011 9:43:00 pm

    SH,why didn't you complain that the bottle had been defaced and thus made unsutable as a present to your heavily pregnant niece, then demand an non-defaced one?
    Just an idea.

    ReplyDelete

"In the eyes of the Tribunal the review letter contained several preconceptions, prejudgments and non-sequiturs"

"the absurdity of this reason is demonstrated by simply stating it"

"We therefore find that Mr Sked misdirected himself as to the Policy in carrying out the review and his decision is therefore one that no reasonable review officer could have arrived at."

... commonly known here at N2D as 'Skeds' ... that is to say these are Judges comments regarding UKBA Review Officer Ian Sked's reasons for rejecting peoples appeals against seizures.

Comments are now moderated to keep out spam and those with malicious intent. The author of this blog is not liable for the content of any comments ... period!

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)