Sign this Petition to Amend Smoking Ban ... lf You Don't Play You Can't Win!

Request from Dick Puddlecote to post this up and spread the word which l am glad to do. Don't ignore it because if you do, the smokophobes will then say we've accepted this stupid ban because no-one signed the petition.

Click here to vote or click on sidebar symbol thingamajig like one here >
Posted by at
Labels:

10 comments:

  1. Dick PuddlecoteTuesday, August 23, 2011 4:53:00 pm

    Thanks SH. I'm with you on the general feeling of helplessness over these type of petition sites (we've already seen one farce with the Freedom Bill site) but as you say, if no-one signs, it plays right into the hands of politico who will say the issue is finished.

    Of course, should we get thousands of signatures, it's very irritating for MPs who wish we would just forget about or 'move on'.

    ReplyDelete
  2. George SpellerTuesday, August 23, 2011 7:04:00 pm

    There are plenty of other pro-choice petitions there. Search for smoking and choose carefully. Why use a bullet when you can fir buckshot?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Smoking HotTuesday, August 23, 2011 9:42:00 pm

    Sounds like a plan, George :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Regular TripperWednesday, August 24, 2011 10:49:00 am

    Already signed up 8-)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Andrea31Wednesday, August 24, 2011 12:10:00 pm

    Me too!

    ReplyDelete
  6. PropWednesday, August 24, 2011 2:39:00 pm

    Done!

    ReplyDelete
  7. AnonymousWednesday, August 24, 2011 5:24:00 pm

    Signed all of them

    ReplyDelete
  8. AnonymousWednesday, August 24, 2011 5:27:00 pm

    Ditto!

    ReplyDelete
  9. AnonymousWednesday, August 24, 2011 9:15:00 pm

    Did your stalker turn up SH?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Smoking HotWednesday, August 24, 2011 9:54:00 pm

    @Andrea31

    No ... he would've been our first troll. lol

    ReplyDelete

"In the eyes of the Tribunal the review letter contained several preconceptions, prejudgments and non-sequiturs"

"the absurdity of this reason is demonstrated by simply stating it"

"We therefore find that Mr Sked misdirected himself as to the Policy in carrying out the review and his decision is therefore one that no reasonable review officer could have arrived at."

... commonly known here at N2D as 'Skeds' ... that is to say these are Judges comments regarding UKBA Review Officer Ian Sked's reasons for rejecting peoples appeals against seizures.

Comments are now moderated to keep out spam and those with malicious intent. The author of this blog is not liable for the content of any comments ... period!

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)