Automated response UKBA

So l sent my complaint against the UKBA's answer to my original complaint about being illegally detained and denied entry to the UK. I accused them of lying and orchestrating a cover-up and supplied them with factual evidence to support my accusations.

I e-mailed it Fri 4th Feb 14.53 ... today l received an automated response Mon 7th Feb 08.32!

Do they all go home very early on a Fri for the weekend and switch the computers off?  :)


  1. Heehee, you caught em out!
    POETS- piss off early, tomorrow's saturday!
    They should leave the computer on if they don't wanna get sussed.

  2. XX Do they all go home very early on a Fri for the weekend and switch the computers off? :)XX

    Maybe, maybe not. What they DO have to do, is ensure all the "refusal" mail goes out so as it gets there either after they have closed Friday, or on Saturday.

    This is to ensure a "cooling off period", which they HOPE means, that two minutes after the post arrives the offices are not jam packed with 100s of VERY angry people. As they have had Saturday and Sunday to "cool off".

  3. Furor ... yeah, l'm sure that works ... NOT! :)

  4. You notice when you recieve letters from the dole. Or ask someone whop does.

    99% of them arrive late Friday, or Saturday morning.

    My exs Auntie worked in the dole and told us why.

  5. Furor, l didn't mean that it doesn't happen. l meant that the UKBA's hope that it would calm people down wouldn't work ... such is the UKBA's arrogance and totally inept PR skills.

    Sorry for the confusion.


"In the eyes of the Tribunal the review letter contained several preconceptions, prejudgments and non-sequiturs"

"the absurdity of this reason is demonstrated by simply stating it"

"We therefore find that Mr Sked misdirected himself as to the Policy in carrying out the review and his decision is therefore one that no reasonable review officer could have arrived at."

... commonly known here at N2D as 'Skeds' ... that is to say these are Judges comments regarding UKBA Review Officer Ian Sked's reasons for rejecting peoples appeals against seizures.

Comments are now moderated to keep out spam and those with malicious intent. The author of this blog is not liable for the content of any comments ... period!