Think l've changed my mind about new airport security measures.

Old Airport Security
New Airport Security
Posted by at
Labels:

9 comments:

  1. MarlboroSaturday, November 06, 2010 1:44:00 pm

    What airline is that!?! ... and when is she flying again? :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. microdaveSaturday, November 06, 2010 3:56:00 pm

    It would certainly simplify matters...

    Tell you what - I'm willing to strip naked for airport security SO LONG AS EVERYBODY ELSE DOES, and that includes ALL the security staff. Then we will see if the little shits are still as obnoxious.

    ReplyDelete
  3. gonzoSaturday, November 06, 2010 5:50:00 pm

    Yeah, but she didn't take her shoes off!

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousSaturday, November 06, 2010 9:54:00 pm

    If you are ubber riche.
    You can do that.
    Huh !
    It's the middle classes who are the stiffies (rod-butt) ?
    Working classes (know how to let the hair down).
    Upper classes (know how to let the hair down).
    Middle classes (rod up the butt).
    Am I right or am I wrong ?
    The ritcheous come from the middle class.
    The middle class have the most ritcheous rod up the butt form of mental illness.
    ps
    Not all the middle classes have the rod up the butt problem but a lot do, whome are more likely to suffer a grey life and believe till their boring end that they did the right thing.

    ReplyDelete
  5. MarlboroSaturday, November 06, 2010 11:22:00 pm

    Shoes? what shoes? oh yeah l see em now. :)

    ReplyDelete
  6. ZaphodSunday, November 07, 2010 8:19:00 am

    I bet that nobody thought to check what's in her trolleycase!

    ReplyDelete
  7. BuckoSunday, November 07, 2010 9:24:00 pm

    You'll change your mind when it's a fat bloke with saggy tits :-)

    ReplyDelete
  8. jredheadgirlSunday, November 07, 2010 10:19:00 pm

    "You'll change your mind when it's a fat bloke with saggy tits :-) "

    Hehe....:-)

    ReplyDelete
  9. Smoking HotSunday, November 07, 2010 10:24:00 pm

    Bucko ... why did you have to do that?
    ;) ... and you too jred! :)

    ReplyDelete

"In the eyes of the Tribunal the review letter contained several preconceptions, prejudgments and non-sequiturs"

"the absurdity of this reason is demonstrated by simply stating it"

"We therefore find that Mr Sked misdirected himself as to the Policy in carrying out the review and his decision is therefore one that no reasonable review officer could have arrived at."

... commonly known here at N2D as 'Skeds' ... that is to say these are Judges comments regarding UKBA Review Officer Ian Sked's reasons for rejecting peoples appeals against seizures.

Comments are now moderated to keep out spam and those with malicious intent. The author of this blog is not liable for the content of any comments ... period!

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)