Thanks to Angry Exile and Bucko

Thanks, it was indeed the copy and paste that caused problems to the text on my blog. Thanks for your time and advice. Very much appreciated. l'll delete previous cry for help post as it's pushing my recent post down. Thanks again.


  1. No problem :-)
    *sits back with a cigar*

  2. As a matter of interest,as some of you may know,
    Imperial Tobacco in collusion with HMG and the
    Eu have imposed restrictions on deliveries of
    UK tobacco to Belgian shops with warning signs
    in ENGLISH only on allowances

    We sincerely hope the defenders of liberty (Web
    and Blog) are going to get this issue up in bright lights

    In the meanwhile a word or two with Imperial(BE)
    would,nt go amiss

    EU Directive
    @2. The Member States are responsible for and entitled to take the measures to protect public safety and public order on their territory. In doing so, they must respect the rules laid down in the 2004 Directive on Free Movement, the fundamental rights of EU citizens and avoid discrimination, notably on grounds of nationality or the belonging to an ethnic minority."

    EU Spokesperson for Justice Commisioner
    dealing with discrimination against nationalities

    Imperial Tobacco

  3. Am in contact with 3 tobacco companies. l'm trying to chase up supposedly recent large seizures of tobacco HRT. l'm drawing a complete blank on these seizures despite UKBA press releases showing everything else. l can.t see them not releasing something like this ... so where is it?

  4. You're welcome. I'd like my fee to be settled in the form of chocolate hobnobs, please. You have your vice, I have mine :-)

  5. SH - can you get that information in a well worded FOI request? Do you visit (or


"In the eyes of the Tribunal the review letter contained several preconceptions, prejudgments and non-sequiturs"

"the absurdity of this reason is demonstrated by simply stating it"

"We therefore find that Mr Sked misdirected himself as to the Policy in carrying out the review and his decision is therefore one that no reasonable review officer could have arrived at."

... commonly known here at N2D as 'Skeds' ... that is to say these are Judges comments regarding UKBA Review Officer Ian Sked's reasons for rejecting peoples appeals against seizures.

Comments are now moderated to keep out spam and those with malicious intent. The author of this blog is not liable for the content of any comments ... period!