WARNING! Do NOT post ANY questions/requests on this blog regarding ANY issues with Border Force (Customs) We now have a FORUM for this where members will gladly help you. GO TO www.n2d.me/bbs
3 comments:
"In the eyes of the Tribunal the review letter contained several preconceptions, prejudgments and non-sequiturs"
"the absurdity of this reason is demonstrated by simply stating it"
"We therefore find that Mr Sked misdirected himself as to the Policy in carrying out the review and his decision is therefore one that no reasonable review officer could have arrived at."
... commonly known here at N2D as 'Skeds' ... that is to say these are Judges comments regarding UKBA Review Officer Ian Sked's reasons for rejecting peoples appeals against seizures.
Comments are now moderated to keep out spam and those with malicious intent. The author of this blog is not liable for the content of any comments ... period!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I pray she goes on a lecturing holiday telling people in Angola about the dangers of smoking...and steps on a land mine!
ReplyDeleteheh heh. good one
ReplyDeleteOne from the Cuckoos Nest
ReplyDeleteDearest Debbie,
In recent years you have had a jolly fine time
plucking the feathers of the current flock of
twittering canaries and budgies in the "freedom"
aviary.But,like Boudicea you thought you were on a winner,you could take on anyone,anywhere,anytime.. Big mistake ,my dear,
now you have caught the attention of the birdies with big wings ,you know ,the nutters,
the chavs,the wackos,the underclass who have seen their drinking holes boarded up.
These back street smackheads had never heard of outfits like ASH and other well funded malcontents. Times they are a'changing
Block Q Secure Unit St Helena.