All docs re:- 155.4 cartons of 200 L&B (31,080), 7.5kg Samson tobacco confiscated and returned on appeal, 2007

I want to thank the people who have sent me their stories and documents regarding their experiences of HMRC, l realise it's a big decision to make and for that l again thank you. Also, if anyone knows of any solicitors that has represented them in appeals l'd be obliged if you would furnish me with their details. lt's difficult to find a solicitor that will represent you in these matters. Why? ... l don't know but if we can put a list together it will help people who have had their goods confiscated and are appealing or have failed their appeal and are then going to court ... every little helps! :).




Posted by at
Labels: ,

1 comment:

  1. MackaMonday, June 28, 2010 8:24:00 pm

    understood some of it but the maths baffled me. prob did hmrc too. lol

    ReplyDelete

"In the eyes of the Tribunal the review letter contained several preconceptions, prejudgments and non-sequiturs"

"the absurdity of this reason is demonstrated by simply stating it"

"We therefore find that Mr Sked misdirected himself as to the Policy in carrying out the review and his decision is therefore one that no reasonable review officer could have arrived at."

... commonly known here at N2D as 'Skeds' ... that is to say these are Judges comments regarding UKBA Review Officer Ian Sked's reasons for rejecting peoples appeals against seizures.

Comments are now moderated to keep out spam and those with malicious intent. The author of this blog is not liable for the content of any comments ... period!

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)