EU Cross-Border Shopping Guide

▼

This was a big hit ... down to the music or the video?

at

9 comments:

  1. MarlboroSunday, October 24, 2010 11:37:00 pm

    What music? there's music ?

    ReplyDelete
  2. ZaphodMonday, October 25, 2010 12:26:00 am

    Very absorbing. I don't recall much of the lyrics, now I come to think of it. I'll watch it again, there may be poetry.

    Probably not suitable for children or servants. Somewhat erotic, in a sense. No? Perhaps it's just me, then?

    ReplyDelete
  3. jredheadgirlMonday, October 25, 2010 6:48:00 am

    Hehe...Yeah, definitely down to the "music":-)

    ReplyDelete
  4. ChucklesMonday, October 25, 2010 9:21:00 am

    Rule 5

    ReplyDelete
  5. MarlboroMonday, October 25, 2010 11:36:00 am

    What the hell is Rule 5?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Smoking HotMonday, October 25, 2010 5:04:00 pm

    Personally l'm sure it's the lyrics! :)

    ReplyDelete
  7. IndyanhatTuesday, October 26, 2010 12:30:00 pm

    Very badly mimed by the singers then , their lips just do not match the words at all, is this the late night version?

    Rule 5 is every now and again have some gratuitous semi-porn thrown in for a little light relief (at least it is sommat like that, more rule 5, more rule 5)

    ReplyDelete
  8. IndyanhatTuesday, October 26, 2010 12:35:00 pm

    Yeah viewed it now , that was the early daytime version mate, there is adirtier late night one around somewhere!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Smoking HotTuesday, October 26, 2010 1:31:00 pm

    Knew you'd know about another version! :)

    Never heard of Rule 5 but l suppose someone feels the need to classify such things

    ReplyDelete

"In the eyes of the Tribunal the review letter contained several preconceptions, prejudgments and non-sequiturs"

"the absurdity of this reason is demonstrated by simply stating it"

"We therefore find that Mr Sked misdirected himself as to the Policy in carrying out the review and his decision is therefore one that no reasonable review officer could have arrived at."

... commonly known here at N2D as 'Skeds' ... that is to say these are Judges comments regarding UKBA Review Officer Ian Sked's reasons for rejecting peoples appeals against seizures.

Comments are now moderated to keep out spam and those with malicious intent. The author of this blog is not liable for the content of any comments ... period!